What are the chances of seeing a Sulphury Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphury Flycatcher sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 307th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sulphury Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphury Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Sulphury Flycatcher?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sulphury Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Sulphury Flycatcher?
6th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Sulphury Flycatcher sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%), Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 10%) and Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Sulphury Flycatcher live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Sulphury Flycatcher that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Lesser Kiskadee (about 50%) and Great Kiskadee (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sulphury Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sulphury Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.