What are the chances of seeing a Passionvine Hopper in Great Otway National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Passionvine Hopper sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 135th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Passionvine Hopper in Great Otway National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Passionvine Hopper in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Passionvine Hopper?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Passionvine Hopper sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Great Otway National Park the best place to see a Passionvine Hopper?
6th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Passionvine Hopper sightings, Great Otway National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Abel Tasman National Park (New Zealand, about 20%), Egmont National Park (New Zealand, about 20%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Passionvine Hopper live in Great Otway National Park?
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Passionvine Hopper that you can see in Great Otway National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Alpine Hairy Cicada (about 10%), Orange Assassin Bug (about 10%) and Red-Eyed Firetail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Passionvine Hopper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Passionvine Hopper is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.