What are the chances of seeing a Wedgling Moth in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Wedgling Moth sighting in Great Smoky Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 628th most-seen of the 822 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wedgling Moth in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
March and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wedgling Moth in Great Smoky Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–August and October–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Wedgling Moth?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wedgling Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Great Smoky Mountains National Park the best place to see a Wedgling Moth?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Wedgling Moth sightings, Great Smoky Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Shenandoah National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Wedgling Moth live in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Wedgling Moth that you can see in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Beautiful Wood-Nymph (about 20%), Hebrew Moth (about 10%) and American Dagger (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wedgling Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wedgling Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.