What are the chances of seeing a Sagebrush Sparrow in Guadalupe Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sagebrush Sparrow sighting in Guadalupe Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 120th most-seen of the 141 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sagebrush Sparrow in Guadalupe Mountains National Park?
December and January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sagebrush Sparrow in Guadalupe Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sagebrush Sparrow?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sagebrush Sparrow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Guadalupe Mountains National Park the best place to see a Sagebrush Sparrow?
2nd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Sagebrush Sparrow sightings, Guadalupe Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Death Valley National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sagebrush Sparrow live in Guadalupe Mountains National Park?
Same family: Passerellidae
The closest relatives of the Sagebrush Sparrow that you can see in Guadalupe Mountains National Park (family Passerellidae, New World Sparrows) are Spotted Towhee (about 70%), Chipping Sparrow (about 60%) and Canyon Towhee (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sagebrush Sparrow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sagebrush Sparrow is recorded against all the birds logged in Guadalupe Mountains National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.