What are the chances of seeing a Pied Water-Tyrant in Henri Pittier National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Water-Tyrant sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 311th most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Water-Tyrant in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Water-Tyrant in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Water-Tyrant?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Water-Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Pied Water-Tyrant?
6th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Pied Water-Tyrant sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 60%), Caroni Swamp (Trinidad and Tobago, about 40%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Water-Tyrant live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Water-Tyrant that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Water-Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Water-Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.