What are the chances of seeing a Slaty-capped Flycatcher in Henri Pittier National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Slaty-capped Flycatcher sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 117 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 61st most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Slaty-capped Flycatcher in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Slaty-capped Flycatcher in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, March, July and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Slaty-capped Flycatcher?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Slaty-capped Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Slaty-capped Flycatcher?
Yes
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Slaty-capped Flycatcher sightings, Henri Pittier National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 20%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Slaty-capped Flycatcher live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Slaty-capped Flycatcher that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Slaty-capped Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Slaty-capped Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (117 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.