What are the chances of seeing a Chalkhill Blue in Hohe Tauern National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chalkhill Blue sighting in Hohe Tauern National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 93rd most-seen of the 165 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chalkhill Blue in Hohe Tauern National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chalkhill Blue in Hohe Tauern National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–June and September–October, the lowest months. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Chalkhill Blue?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chalkhill Blue sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hohe Tauern National Park the best place to see a Chalkhill Blue?
9th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Chalkhill Blue sightings, Hohe Tauern National Park ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 40%), Vanoise National Park (France, about 40%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Chalkhill Blue live in Hohe Tauern National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Chalkhill Blue that you can see in Hohe Tauern National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Scarce Copper (about 50%), Small Blue (about 30%) and Mazarine Blue (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chalkhill Blue sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chalkhill Blue is recorded against all the insects logged in Hohe Tauern National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.