What are the chances of seeing a Green Hairstreak in Hohe Tauern National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Green Hairstreak sighting in Hohe Tauern National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 40th most-seen of the 165 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green Hairstreak in Hohe Tauern National Park?
April and May
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Green Hairstreak in Hohe Tauern National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and August–October, the lowest months. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Green Hairstreak?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hohe Tauern National Park the best place to see a Green Hairstreak?
Among the best
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Green Hairstreak sightings, Hohe Tauern National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Vanoise National Park (France, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Green Hairstreak live in Hohe Tauern National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Green Hairstreak that you can see in Hohe Tauern National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Scarce Copper (about 50%), Small Blue (about 30%) and Mazarine Blue (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Hohe Tauern National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.