What are the chances of seeing a Wandering Tattler in Isla del Coco National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler sighting in Isla del Coco National Park on a given day, based on 156 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 11th most-seen of the 69 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wandering Tattler in Isla del Coco National Park?
September
In that month about 90% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler in Isla del Coco National Park on a given day, against about 30% in February and November–December, the lowest months. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Wandering Tattler?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wandering Tattler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Isla del Coco National Park the best place to see a Wandering Tattler?
Yes
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Wandering Tattler sightings, Isla del Coco National Park has the highest daily chance: about 50%. Next come Galápagos Islands (Ecuador, about 40%) and Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Wandering Tattler live in Isla del Coco National Park?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Wandering Tattler that you can see in Isla del Coco National Park (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Lesser Yellowlegs (about 10%), Solitary Sandpiper (about 10%) and Greater Yellowlegs (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wandering Tattler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wandering Tattler is recorded against all the birds logged in Isla del Coco National Park (156 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.