What are the chances of seeing a Short-billed Dowitcher in Isla del Coco National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Short-billed Dowitcher sighting in Isla del Coco National Park on a given day, based on 60 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 69 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-billed Dowitcher in Isla del Coco National Park?
September
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Short-billed Dowitcher in Isla del Coco National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November, the lowest month. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Short-billed Dowitcher?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-billed Dowitcher sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Isla del Coco National Park the best place to see a Short-billed Dowitcher?
3rd of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Short-billed Dowitcher sightings, Isla del Coco National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%) and Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Short-billed Dowitcher live in Isla del Coco National Park?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Short-billed Dowitcher that you can see in Isla del Coco National Park (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Whimbrel (about 80%), Wandering Tattler (about 50%) and Spotted Sandpiper (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-billed Dowitcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-billed Dowitcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Isla del Coco National Park (60 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.