What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-wattled Lapwing in Jim Corbett National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-wattled Lapwing sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 31 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 260th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-wattled Lapwing in Jim Corbett National Park?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-wattled Lapwing in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-wattled Lapwing?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-wattled Lapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Yellow-wattled Lapwing?
13th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Yellow-wattled Lapwing sightings, Jim Corbett National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%), Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%) and Kanha National Park (India, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Yellow-wattled Lapwing live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same genus: Vanellus
The closest relatives of the Yellow-wattled Lapwing that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (genus Vanellus, Lapwings) are Red-wattled Lapwing (about 50%) and River Lapwing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-wattled Lapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-wattled Lapwing is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (31 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.