What are the chances of seeing an Ash-throated Flycatcher in Joshua Tree National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Ash-throated Flycatcher sighting in Joshua Tree National Park on a given day, based on 824 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 25th most-seen of the 141 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ash-throated Flycatcher in Joshua Tree National Park?
June
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report an Ash-throated Flycatcher in Joshua Tree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ash-throated Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ash-throated Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Joshua Tree National Park the best place to see an Ash-throated Flycatcher?
6th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Ash-throated Flycatcher sightings, Joshua Tree National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 60%), Big Bend National Park (United States, about 50%) and Bahía de Loreto National Park (Mexico, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ash-throated Flycatcher live in Joshua Tree National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Ash-throated Flycatcher that you can see in Joshua Tree National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Say's Phoebe (about 40%), Black Phoebe (about 10%) and Vermilion Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ash-throated Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ash-throated Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Joshua Tree National Park (824 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.