What are the chances of seeing a Black-headed Monitor in Kakadu National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-headed Monitor sighting in Kakadu National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 54 reptiles we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-headed Monitor in Kakadu National Park?
January
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Black-headed Monitor in Kakadu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, September–October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Kakadu National Park's wettest months, with about 350 mm of rain against almost none in August.
What time of day is best to see a Black-headed Monitor?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-headed Monitor sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kakadu National Park the best place to see a Black-headed Monitor?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Black-headed Monitor sightings, Kakadu National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Black-headed Monitor live in Kakadu National Park?
Same genus: Varanus
The closest relatives of the Black-headed Monitor that you can see in Kakadu National Park (genus Varanus, Monitor Lizards) are Argus Monitor (about 30%), Mertens's Water Monitor (about 30%) and Gould's Goanna (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-headed Monitor sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-headed Monitor is recorded against all the reptiles logged in Kakadu National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.