What are the chances of seeing a Red Avadavat in Kanha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red Avadavat sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 246 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 143rd most-seen of the 286 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red Avadavat in Kanha National Park?
January and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red Avadavat in Kanha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–September and December, the lowest months. Those are among Kanha National Park's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 430 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Red Avadavat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red Avadavat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kanha National Park the best place to see a Red Avadavat?
4th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Red Avadavat sightings, Kanha National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 10%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 10%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red Avadavat live in Kanha National Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Red Avadavat that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are Nutmeg Mannikin (about 20%) and White-rumped Munia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red Avadavat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red Avadavat is recorded against all the birds logged in Kanha National Park (246 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.