What are the chances of seeing a Common Tailorbird in Kanha National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Common Tailorbird sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 8,558 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 10th most-seen of the 286 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Tailorbird in Kanha National Park?
July to September
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Common Tailorbird in Kanha National Park on a given day, against about 50% in February, the lowest month. Those are among Kanha National Park's wettest months, with about 370 mm of rain a month against 10 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Common Tailorbird?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Tailorbird sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kanha National Park the best place to see a Common Tailorbird?
Yes
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Common Tailorbird sightings, Kanha National Park has the highest daily chance: about 60%. Next come Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%) and Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Tailorbird live in Kanha National Park?
Same family: Cisticolidae
The closest relatives of the Common Tailorbird that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Cisticolidae, Cisticolas and Allies) are Gray-breasted Prinia (about 30%), Ashy Prinia (about 20%) and Zitting Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Tailorbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Tailorbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Kanha National Park (8,558 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.