What are the chances of seeing a Himalayan Buzzard in Kaziranga National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Himalayan Buzzard sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 316th most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Himalayan Buzzard in Kaziranga National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Himalayan Buzzard in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August–September and November–May, the lowest months. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Himalayan Buzzard?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Himalayan Buzzard sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Himalayan Buzzard?
8th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Himalayan Buzzard sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Jiuzhaigou National Park (China, about 10%), Langtang National Park (Nepal, about 10%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Himalayan Buzzard live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Himalayan Buzzard that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Gray-headed Fish-Eagle (about 70%), Crested Serpent Eagle (about 60%) and Pallas's Fish Eagle (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Himalayan Buzzard sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Himalayan Buzzard is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.