What are the chances of seeing a Golden-bellied Gerygone in Khao Luang National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-bellied Gerygone sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 49 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 127th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-bellied Gerygone in Khao Luang National Park?
January and May
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-bellied Gerygone in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June–July, September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-bellied Gerygone?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-bellied Gerygone sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Golden-bellied Gerygone?
3rd of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Golden-bellied Gerygone sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 40%) and Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Golden-bellied Gerygone live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Golden-bellied Gerygone that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Red-eyed Bulbul (about 70%), Asian Fairy-bluebird (about 70%) and White-rumped Shama (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-bellied Gerygone sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-bellied Gerygone is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (49 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.