What are the chances of seeing a Golden-bellied Gerygone in Khao Sok National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-bellied Gerygone sighting in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 213 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-bellied Gerygone in Khao Sok National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-bellied Gerygone in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-bellied Gerygone?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-bellied Gerygone sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Sok National Park the best place to see a Golden-bellied Gerygone?
9th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Golden-bellied Gerygone sightings, Khao Sok National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 40%), Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 20%) and Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Golden-bellied Gerygone live in Khao Sok National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Golden-bellied Gerygone that you can see in Khao Sok National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are White-rumped Shama (about 60%), Black-crested Bulbul (about 50%) and Pin-striped Tit-Babbler (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-bellied Gerygone sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-bellied Gerygone is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Sok National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.