What are the chances of seeing a Broad-billed Flycatcher in Litchfield National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Flycatcher sighting in Litchfield National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 105th most-seen of the 110 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad-billed Flycatcher in Litchfield National Park?
September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Flycatcher in Litchfield National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October and December–August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Broad-billed Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad-billed Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Litchfield National Park the best place to see a Broad-billed Flycatcher?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Broad-billed Flycatcher sightings, Litchfield National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Nitmiluk National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Broad-billed Flycatcher live in Litchfield National Park?
Same genus: Myiagra
The closest relatives of the Broad-billed Flycatcher that you can see in Litchfield National Park (genus Myiagra, Myiagra Flycatchers) are Shining Flycatcher (about 30%), Leaden Flycatcher (about 20%) and Paperbark Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad-billed Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad-billed Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Litchfield National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.