What are the chances of seeing a Cut-throat in Liwonde National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cut-throat sighting in Liwonde National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 205th most-seen of the 267 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cut-throat in Liwonde National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cut-throat in Liwonde National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–June and September–November, the lowest months. That is one of Liwonde National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain against almost none in July.
What time of day is best to see a Cut-throat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cut-throat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Liwonde National Park the best place to see a Cut-throat?
11th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Cut-throat sightings, Liwonde National Park ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Samburu National Reserve (Kenya, about 30%), Tsavo East National Park (Kenya, about 30%) and Awash National Park (Ethiopia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Cut-throat live in Liwonde National Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Cut-throat that you can see in Liwonde National Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are Blue-breasted Cordonbleu (about 50%), Red-billed Firefinch (about 20%) and Bronze Mannikin (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cut-throat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cut-throat is recorded against all the birds logged in Liwonde National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.