What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-bellied Euphonia in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-bellied Euphonia sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 312 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 211th most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-bellied Euphonia in Manu National Park?
February, May–August and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-bellied Euphonia in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, September and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-bellied Euphonia?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-bellied Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Rufous-bellied Euphonia?
3rd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Rufous-bellied Euphonia sightings, Manu National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-bellied Euphonia live in Manu National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Rufous-bellied Euphonia that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Golden-bellied Euphonia (about 10%), Orange-bellied Euphonia (about 10%) and Thick-billed Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-bellied Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-bellied Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (312 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.