What are the chances of seeing a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Manu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 556th most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Manu National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Manu National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
13th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings, Manu National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 30%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 20%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Fringillidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia that you can see in Manu National Park (family Fringillidae, Finches, Euphonias, and Allies) are Golden-bellied Euphonia (about 10%), Orange-bellied Euphonia (about 10%) and Thick-billed Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-naped Chlorophonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.