What are the chances of seeing a Purple-throated Euphonia in Manu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Purple-throated Euphonia sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 571st most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Purple-throated Euphonia in Manu National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Purple-throated Euphonia in Manu National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Purple-throated Euphonia?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Purple-throated Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Purple-throated Euphonia?
17th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Purple-throated Euphonia sightings, Manu National Park ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 40%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 40%) and Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Purple-throated Euphonia live in Manu National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Purple-throated Euphonia that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Golden-bellied Euphonia (about 10%), Orange-bellied Euphonia (about 10%) and Thick-billed Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Purple-throated Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Purple-throated Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.