What are the chances of seeing a Spot-crowned Euphonia in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Spot-crowned Euphonia sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 35 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 195th most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Spot-crowned Euphonia in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Spot-crowned Euphonia in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Spot-crowned Euphonia?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Spot-crowned Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Spot-crowned Euphonia?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Spot-crowned Euphonia sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%), Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Spot-crowned Euphonia live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Spot-crowned Euphonia that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Yellow-crowned Euphonia (about 20%) and Thick-billed Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Spot-crowned Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Spot-crowned Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (35 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.