What are the chances of seeing a Streak-chested Antpitta in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-chested Antpitta sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 269th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Streak-chested Antpitta in Marino Ballena National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-chested Antpitta in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Streak-chested Antpitta?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Streak-chested Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Streak-chested Antpitta?
7th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Streak-chested Antpitta sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Carara National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Streak-chested Antpitta live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Streak-chested Antpitta that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great Kiskadee (about 80%), Tropical Kingbird (about 70%) and Scarlet-rumped Tanager (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Streak-chested Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Streak-chested Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.