What are the chances of seeing a Ceiba Borer in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ceiba Borer sighting in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 37th most-seen of the 114 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ceiba Borer in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
March, May–June, August and October–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ceiba Borer in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April, July and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ceiba Borer?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ceiba Borer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Parque Natural Metropolitano the best place to see a Ceiba Borer?
Among the best
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Ceiba Borer sightings, Parque Natural Metropolitano ranks 5th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%), Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Ceiba Borer live in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Ceiba Borer that you can see in Parque Natural Metropolitano (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Imatidium thoracicum (about 10%) and Taeniotes scalatus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ceiba Borer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ceiba Borer is recorded against all the insects logged in Parque Natural Metropolitano (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.