What are the chances of seeing a White-bellied Woodpecker in Mudumalai National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-bellied Woodpecker sighting in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 208th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-bellied Woodpecker in Mudumalai National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-bellied Woodpecker in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a White-bellied Woodpecker?
Between 1 and 4 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-bellied Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Mudumalai National Park the best place to see a White-bellied Woodpecker?
12th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate White-bellied Woodpecker sightings, Mudumalai National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sepilok (Malaysia, about 30%), Nagarhole National Park (India, about 20%) and Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the White-bellied Woodpecker live in Mudumalai National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the White-bellied Woodpecker that you can see in Mudumalai National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Black-rumped Flameback (about 50%), Brown-capped Woodpecker (about 30%) and Yellow-crowned Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-bellied Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-bellied Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Mudumalai National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.