What are the chances of seeing a Himalayan Buzzard in Namdapha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Himalayan Buzzard sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 254th most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Himalayan Buzzard in Namdapha National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Himalayan Buzzard in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to May, the lowest months. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Himalayan Buzzard?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Himalayan Buzzard sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Himalayan Buzzard?
6th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Himalayan Buzzard sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Jiuzhaigou National Park (China, about 10%), Langtang National Park (Nepal, about 10%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Himalayan Buzzard live in Namdapha National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Himalayan Buzzard that you can see in Namdapha National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Crested Serpent Eagle (about 20%), Oriental Honey-buzzard (about 10%) and Mountain Hawk-Eagle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Himalayan Buzzard sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Himalayan Buzzard is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.