What are the chances of seeing a Striped Saddlebags in Palo Verde National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Striped Saddlebags sighting in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 30 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Striped Saddlebags in Palo Verde National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Striped Saddlebags in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, July and September–November, the lowest months. That is one of Palo Verde National Park's wettest months, with about 300 mm of rain against almost none in February.
What time of day is best to see a Striped Saddlebags?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Striped Saddlebags sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Palo Verde National Park the best place to see a Striped Saddlebags?
3rd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Striped Saddlebags sightings, Palo Verde National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Galápagos Islands (Ecuador, about 20%) and Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Striped Saddlebags live in Palo Verde National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Striped Saddlebags that you can see in Palo Verde National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Great Pondhawk (about 50%), Flame-Tailed Pondhawk (about 30%) and Pin-Tailed Pondhawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Striped Saddlebags sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Striped Saddlebags is recorded against all the insects logged in Palo Verde National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.