What are the chances of seeing a Four-lined Ameiva in Piedras Blancas National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Four-lined Ameiva sighting in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, based on 24 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 17th most-seen of the 35 reptiles we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Four-lined Ameiva in Piedras Blancas National Park?
June–July and December
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Four-lined Ameiva in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Four-lined Ameiva?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Four-lined Ameiva sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Piedras Blancas National Park the best place to see a Four-lined Ameiva?
4th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Four-lined Ameiva sightings, Piedras Blancas National Park ranks 4th at about 30%. The best odds are in Cahuita National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%), Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%) and Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Four-lined Ameiva live in Piedras Blancas National Park?
Same genus: Holcosus
The closest relatives of the Four-lined Ameiva that you can see in Piedras Blancas National Park (genus Holcosus, Northwestern Ameivas) are Middle American Ameiva (about 50%) and Delicate Ameiva (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Four-lined Ameiva sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Four-lined Ameiva is recorded against all the reptiles logged in Piedras Blancas National Park (24 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.