What are the chances of seeing an Azure Damselfly in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report an Azure Damselfly sighting in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 17th most-seen of the 51 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Azure Damselfly in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
June
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report an Azure Damselfly in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and September–October, the lowest months. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Azure Damselfly?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Azure Damselfly sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Plitvice Lakes National Park the best place to see an Azure Damselfly?
Yes
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Azure Damselfly sightings, Plitvice Lakes National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 30%) and Snowdonia National Park (United Kingdom, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Azure Damselfly live in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Same family: Coenagrionidae
The closest relatives of the Azure Damselfly that you can see in Plitvice Lakes National Park (family Coenagrionidae, Narrow-winged Damselflies) are Common Blue Damselfly (about 50%) and Large Red Damselfly (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Azure Damselfly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Azure Damselfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Plitvice Lakes National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.