What are the chances of seeing a Dull-colored Grassquit in Podocarpus National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dull-colored Grassquit sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 384th most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dull-colored Grassquit in Podocarpus National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dull-colored Grassquit in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Dull-colored Grassquit?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dull-colored Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Dull-colored Grassquit?
Among the best
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Dull-colored Grassquit sightings, Podocarpus National Park ranks 5th at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Henri Pittier National Park (Venezuela, under 5%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, under 5%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Dull-colored Grassquit live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Dull-colored Grassquit that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Lacrimose Mountain-Tanager (about 40%), Masked Flowerpiercer (about 40%) and Blue-necked Tanager (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dull-colored Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dull-colored Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.