What are the chances of seeing a Baglafecht Weaver in Samburu National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver sighting in Samburu National Reserve on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 303rd most-seen of the 341 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baglafecht Weaver in Samburu National Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver in Samburu National Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baglafecht Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Samburu National Reserve the best place to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
22nd of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Baglafecht Weaver sightings, Samburu National Reserve ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 60%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 60%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver live in Samburu National Reserve?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver that you can see in Samburu National Reserve (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Chestnut Weaver (about 40%), Golden Palm Weaver (about 20%) and Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baglafecht Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baglafecht Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Samburu National Reserve (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.