What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Casiornis in Serra da Canastra National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Casiornis sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 45 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 170th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Casiornis in Serra da Canastra National Park?
March, May and August–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Casiornis in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April and June–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Casiornis?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Casiornis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Rufous Casiornis?
3rd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Rufous Casiornis sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and Emas National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Casiornis live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Casiornis that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), White-rumped Monjita (about 50%) and Crested Black-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Casiornis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Casiornis is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (45 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.