What are the chances of seeing a Thrush-like Antpitta in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thrush-like Antpitta sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 380th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thrush-like Antpitta in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
April
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thrush-like Antpitta in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Thrush-like Antpitta?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thrush-like Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Thrush-like Antpitta?
7th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Thrush-like Antpitta sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%) and Manu National Park (Peru, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Thrush-like Antpitta live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Thrush-like Antpitta that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Violaceous Jay (about 70%), Tropical Kingbird (about 60%) and Palm Tanager (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thrush-like Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thrush-like Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.