What are the chances of seeing a Swallow Tanager in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 492 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 10th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Swallow Tanager in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
May
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against about 20% in July, the lowest month. That is one of Sierra de la Macarena National Park's wettest months, with about 430 mm of rain against 95 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Swallow Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Swallow Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Swallow Tanager?
2nd of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Swallow Tanager sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Swallow Tanager live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Swallow Tanager that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Palm Tanager (about 50%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%) and Silver-beaked Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Swallow Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Swallow Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (492 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.