What are the chances of seeing a Black Pondhawk in Soberanía National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black Pondhawk sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 54 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 15th most-seen of the 253 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Pondhawk in Soberanía National Park?
February–March and September
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black Pondhawk in Soberanía National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and November, the lowest months. Those are among Soberanía National Park's driest months, with about 130 mm of rain a month against 350 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Black Pondhawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Pondhawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Black Pondhawk?
Yes
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black Pondhawk sightings, Soberanía National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 10%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black Pondhawk live in Soberanía National Park?
Same genus: Erythemis
The closest relatives of the Black Pondhawk that you can see in Soberanía National Park (genus Erythemis, Pondhawks) are Flame-Tailed Pondhawk (about 30%), Pin-Tailed Pondhawk (about 20%) and Claret Pondhawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Pondhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Pondhawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Soberanía National Park (54 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.