What are the chances of seeing a Streak-chested Antpitta in Soberanía National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-chested Antpitta sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 1,868 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 128th most-seen of the 449 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Streak-chested Antpitta in Soberanía National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-chested Antpitta in Soberanía National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Streak-chested Antpitta?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Streak-chested Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Streak-chested Antpitta?
Among the best
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Streak-chested Antpitta sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Carara National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Streak-chested Antpitta live in Soberanía National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Streak-chested Antpitta that you can see in Soberanía National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), Palm Tanager (about 60%) and Cocoa Woodcreeper (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Streak-chested Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Streak-chested Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Soberanía National Park (1,868 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.