What are the chances of seeing a Satin Bowerbird in Springbrook National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Satin Bowerbird sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 195 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 136 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Satin Bowerbird in Springbrook National Park?
January–February and July
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Satin Bowerbird in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against about 20% in April, June and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Satin Bowerbird?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Satin Bowerbird sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Satin Bowerbird?
5th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Satin Bowerbird sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 5th at about 30%. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 80%), Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 50%) and Royal National Park (Australia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Satin Bowerbird live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Ptilonorhynchidae
The closest relatives of the Satin Bowerbird that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Ptilonorhynchidae, Bowerbirds) are Green Catbird (about 20%) and Regent Bowerbird (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Satin Bowerbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Satin Bowerbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Springbrook National Park (195 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.