What are the chances of seeing a Sooty-headed Bulbul in Tangkoko Nature Reserve?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Sooty-headed Bulbul sighting in Tangkoko Nature Reserve on a given day, based on 56 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 138 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sooty-headed Bulbul in Tangkoko Nature Reserve?
February and August
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Sooty-headed Bulbul in Tangkoko Nature Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Sooty-headed Bulbul?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sooty-headed Bulbul sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tangkoko Nature Reserve the best place to see a Sooty-headed Bulbul?
Yes
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Sooty-headed Bulbul sightings, Tangkoko Nature Reserve has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 40%) and Gunung Leuser National Park (Indonesia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Sooty-headed Bulbul live in Tangkoko Nature Reserve?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Sooty-headed Bulbul that you can see in Tangkoko Nature Reserve (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Hair-crested Drongo (about 70%), Finch-billed Myna (about 50%) and Grey-sided Flowerpecker (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sooty-headed Bulbul sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sooty-headed Bulbul is recorded against all the birds logged in Tangkoko Nature Reserve (56 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.