What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Grosbeak in Tikal National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Grosbeak sighting in Tikal National Park on a given day, based on 81 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 183rd most-seen of the 300 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Grosbeak in Tikal National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Grosbeak in Tikal National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Grosbeak?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Grosbeak sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tikal National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Grosbeak?
7th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Black-faced Grosbeak sightings, Tikal National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 30%), Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Grosbeak live in Tikal National Park?
Same family: Cardinalidae
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Grosbeak that you can see in Tikal National Park (family Cardinalidae, Cardinals and Allies) are Summer Tanager (about 40%), Red-crowned Ant-Tanager (about 20%) and Blue Bunting (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Grosbeak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Grosbeak is recorded against all the birds logged in Tikal National Park (81 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.