What are the chances of seeing a Pin-tailed Snipe in Udawalawe National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pin-tailed Snipe sighting in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 132nd most-seen of the 166 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pin-tailed Snipe in Udawalawe National Park?
February and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pin-tailed Snipe in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and March–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pin-tailed Snipe?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pin-tailed Snipe sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Udawalawe National Park the best place to see a Pin-tailed Snipe?
4th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Pin-tailed Snipe sightings, Udawalawe National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%) and Periyar National Park (India, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Pin-tailed Snipe live in Udawalawe National Park?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Pin-tailed Snipe that you can see in Udawalawe National Park (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Common Sandpiper (about 30%), Wood Sandpiper (about 20%) and Marsh Sandpiper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pin-tailed Snipe sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pin-tailed Snipe is recorded against all the birds logged in Udawalawe National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.