What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Woodswallow in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Woodswallow sighting in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park on a given day, based on 216 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 13th most-seen of the 84 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Woodswallow in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park?
April–May and October–December
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Woodswallow in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park on a given day, against about 20% in February, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Woodswallow?
Yes
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Black-faced Woodswallow sightings, Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Cape Range (Australia, about 10%) and Nitmiluk National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Woodswallow live in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park?
Same genus: Artamus
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Woodswallow that you can see in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (genus Artamus, Woodswallows) are Little Woodswallow (about 40%) and Masked Woodswallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (216 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.