What are the chances of seeing a Flame-colored Tanager in Volcán Barú National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Flame-colored Tanager sighting in Volcán Barú National Park on a given day, based on 1,219 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 296 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Flame-colored Tanager in Volcán Barú National Park?
August and November
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Flame-colored Tanager in Volcán Barú National Park on a given day, against about 50% in February, April, June–July, September–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Flame-colored Tanager?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Flame-colored Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Volcán Barú National Park the best place to see a Flame-colored Tanager?
2nd of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Flame-colored Tanager sightings, Volcán Barú National Park ranks 2nd at about 60%. The best odds are in Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Flame-colored Tanager live in Volcán Barú National Park?
Same genus: Piranga
The closest relatives of the Flame-colored Tanager that you can see in Volcán Barú National Park (genus Piranga, Piranga Tanagers) are Summer Tanager (about 10%) and White-winged Tanager (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Flame-colored Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Flame-colored Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Volcán Barú National Park (1,219 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.