What are the chances of seeing a Croaking Cisticola in Akagera National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Croaking Cisticola sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 136 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 92nd most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Croaking Cisticola in Akagera National Park?
March to May
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Croaking Cisticola in Akagera National Park on a given day, against about 10% in August and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Croaking Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Croaking Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Croaking Cisticola?
4th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Croaking Cisticola sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 4th at about 20%. The best odds are in Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 50%), Queen Elizabeth National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Croaking Cisticola live in Akagera National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Croaking Cisticola that you can see in Akagera National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Trilling Cisticola (about 30%), Tabora Cisticola (about 20%) and Winding Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Croaking Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Croaking Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (136 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.