What are the chances of seeing a Singing Cisticola in Akagera National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Singing Cisticola sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 234th most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Singing Cisticola in Akagera National Park?
March–April, October and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Singing Cisticola in Akagera National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Singing Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Singing Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Singing Cisticola?
8th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Singing Cisticola sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 40%), Arusha National Park (Tanzania, about 30%) and Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Singing Cisticola live in Akagera National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Singing Cisticola that you can see in Akagera National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Trilling Cisticola (about 30%), Croaking Cisticola (about 20%) and Tabora Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Singing Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Singing Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.