What are the chances of seeing a Winding Cisticola in Akagera National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Winding Cisticola sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 76 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 130th most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Winding Cisticola in Akagera National Park?
February–April, July, October and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Winding Cisticola in Akagera National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, May–June, August–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Winding Cisticola?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Winding Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Winding Cisticola?
12th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Winding Cisticola sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 12th at about 10%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 50%), Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Amboseli National Park (Kenya, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Winding Cisticola live in Akagera National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Winding Cisticola that you can see in Akagera National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Trilling Cisticola (about 30%), Croaking Cisticola (about 20%) and Tabora Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Winding Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Winding Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (76 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.