What are the chances of seeing a Dark Apricot Sulphur in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dark Apricot Sulphur sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 68th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dark Apricot Sulphur in Arenal Volcano National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dark Apricot Sulphur in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Dark Apricot Sulphur?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dark Apricot Sulphur sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Dark Apricot Sulphur?
8th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Dark Apricot Sulphur sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Dark Apricot Sulphur live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same genus: Phoebis
The closest relatives of the Dark Apricot Sulphur that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (genus Phoebis) are Orange-Barred Sulphur (about 10%) and Cloudless Sulphur (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dark Apricot Sulphur sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dark Apricot Sulphur is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.