What are the chances of seeing a Dainty Sulphur in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dainty Sulphur sighting in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 57 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dainty Sulphur in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
December
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Dainty Sulphur in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to September, the lowest months. That is one of Bahía de Loreto National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 80 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Dainty Sulphur?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dainty Sulphur sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bahía de Loreto National Park the best place to see a Dainty Sulphur?
3rd of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Dainty Sulphur sightings, Bahía de Loreto National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Big Bend National Park (United States, about 30%) and Saguaro National Park (United States, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Dainty Sulphur live in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Same family: Pieridae
The closest relatives of the Dainty Sulphur that you can see in Bahía de Loreto National Park (family Pieridae, Whites, Yellows, and Sulphurs) are Great Southern White (about 40%), Large Orange Sulphur (about 20%) and Southern Dogface (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dainty Sulphur sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dainty Sulphur is recorded against all the insects logged in Bahía de Loreto National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.