What are the chances of seeing a Surf Scoter in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Surf Scoter sighting in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Surf Scoter in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Surf Scoter in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months. That is one of Bahía de Loreto National Park's driest months, with about 5 mm of rain against 80 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Surf Scoter?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Surf Scoter sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bahía de Loreto National Park the best place to see a Surf Scoter?
15th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Surf Scoter sightings, Bahía de Loreto National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 40%), Great Bear Rainforest (Canada, about 30%) and Redwood National Park (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Surf Scoter live in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Same family: Anatidae
The closest relatives of the Surf Scoter that you can see in Bahía de Loreto National Park (family Anatidae, Ducks, Geese, and Swans) are Redhead (about 10%), Ruddy Duck (about 10%) and Blue-winged Teal (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Surf Scoter sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Surf Scoter is recorded against all the birds logged in Bahía de Loreto National Park (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.